Q&A: must christian missionary be prohibited in India?

Problem by sean paul: ought to christian missionary be prohibited in India?
Sati-Pratha is a favorite topic between Hindu-bashers. As quickly as they are questioned about the validity of their personal claims, targets and techniques they right away start off harping on Sati-Pratha.

And lo! The trick operates. The questioning Hindu becomes defensive. He in no way tries to probe into the origin of so-called Sati-Pratha, or at least about its rumours. So, let us attempt to do it here, what the standard-Hindu usually refrains to.

Sati-Pratha is nowhere mentioned in Hindu scriptures. Not a hint of it. There is no scenario of forceful widow burning in any of our scriptures. News about Sati-Pratha started out surfacing only with the introduction of Christian Missionaries in India. They with their mission of transforming the wretched idolaters, i.e., Hindus to Christianity started out slandering Hinduism. For they speedily perceived that Hindus were an unyielding, staunch lot. They would not yield to the treacherous approaches of Christian Missionaries. So they devised a new way for carrying out their Harvest. They determined to slander Hinduism in front of Hindus, so as to shake their perception in it, and also in front of international local community so as to justify their demonic agendas of Conversion. And for that they had a new device in their arms to which Hindus had no accessibility. This resource was the merged establishment of Present day British Schooling Technique and the recently born media, i.e., the propaganda device. (How they produced these mediums in India is an additional theme, associated to Macaulay and several other individuals and way too prolonged to be mentioned right here).

So, they started out their properly-planned marketing campaign against Hinduism. A quite very good case in point of this is the English phrase ?Juggernaut?, which means, ?a massive and mind-boggling force?. It is originated kind the Rath Yatra of Jagganath. Christian Missionaries mentioned that there goes a single evil Yatra amid Hindus, in which wretched idolaters just take out a procession of a few idols. In the Yatra, they take intoxicating medicines, dance nude in front of the chariot, make obscene gestures to each other and then in a in shape toss on their own in front of the chariot to commit suicide. Therefore, the phrase with its which means of an ?overwhelming force?.

Swami Vivekanand also mentions this at one particular area alongside with numerous other calumnies heaped around Hinduism and Hindu civilization by the creating Christian Missionaries. The following is an excerpt of that, ?What is meant by people pictures in the school-guides for youngsters where the Hindu mother is painted as throwing her kids to the crocodiles in the Ganga? The mom is black, but the baby is painted white, to arouse far more sympathy, and get more dollars. What is meant by those images, which painted a man burning his spouse at a stake with his personal fingers, so that she may possibly grow to be a ghost and torment the husband?s enemy? What is meant by the pictures of huge vehicles crushing around human beings? I have heard a single of these gentlemen preach in Memphis that, in every single village of India, there is a pond of the bones of small infants? What have the Hindus carried out to these disciples of Christ that every single Christian kid is taught to call the Hindus ?vile? and ?wretched? and the most horrible demons on earth?? Swami Vivekananda, The Total
Works, Vol. IV (1945 ed.)

Any individual even most slightly acquainted with the Rath Yatra needs no describing about the real truth.

Likewise, they harped on Sati, and invented the extremely phrase and trend of Sati-Pratha, citing some allegedly eye-witness accounts of widow burning on the funeral pyre of their husband. So, what was the fact in individuals accounts? If, there was any reality in those accounts, then what was their origin?

For finding their origin, we have to stretch our memory some generations again to the Medieval Ages, the era of fantastic unprecedented rape, pillage and looting of India by Muslims and their armies. Amid the really very first provinces to bear the brunt of Islamic sword were Sindh, Punjab and Rajputana. Sindh getting Buddhist in greater part and Punjab also obtaining a substantial population of Buddhists, succumbed quickly to the unprecedented barbarous Islamic invasions. But Rajputana being totally Hindu held out for decades. Even now there are only 9% Muslims in Rajasthan. But this resistance price them a excellent deal. They had in no way faced such barbarous invaders and looters. All of the wars which they fought right up until then, were fought with a ethical ethical code. Getting synonymous with the Hindu philosophy, wars were fought only between warriors and involved only them. Civil populace was by no means even touched, let alone molested.

But the new Islamic enemy they were now struggling with was an unprecedented evil force, which did not count on valour for triumph, but instead on treachery, deceit, malice, crookedness and all other evil signifies. Individuals Islamic armies as a substitute of combating chivalrously with their opponents, selected to decimate the civilian populace, by laying siege to the place aspect, thus decimating the social, cultural and economic material of the nations. They massacred and butchered complete populations of Hindus, broke their idols, desecrated their temples, butchered the Brahmins, transformed them forcibly to Islam (by generating them consume beef!) destroyed their corps, poisoned their wells, burned their homes, abducted their children and raped their women. They took their inspiration from Quran. Ayats two:193, eight:39, orders them to break idols. Ayats eight:twelve, 22: 19-22 exhorts them to massacre the spiritual leaders of the other religion. Ayats 33:59 and 4:24 encourages them to commit sexual transgressions without compunction with the non-Muslim ladies.

This, this last atrocity carried out to the nearby populace by these Islamic marauders was without having precedence in cruelty. (No a single in Hindu era even considered of touching an additional girl, let on your own raping her). It was a increased calamity on females than their family men. They did not think of these calamity befalling them in their wildest nightmares. They have been cost-free ladies under Hinduism with an equal say in culture as adult males. They were not utilized to the sexual, and psychological humiliation and torture to which Muslim and non-Muslim women underneath Islamic rule had been subjected to. Chastity for them was every little thing, the prime value of existence. They could not imagine an unchaste life. The extremely principle was unthinkable to them. And for preserving their chastity they had been ready to do anything, to break each and every barrier, to sacrifice each tying, even their existence. And so they did.

Struggling with these Islamic molesters, the brave Hindu women selected loss of life. They developed large cauldron like pots, lit then with hearth and jumped into them, to die voluntarily and fortunately in purchase to conserve their honour and chastity. They selected and embraced loss of life themselves and no one pressured them to do so. They with their quite female bravery defied entire armies of Islamic marauders with all of their evil signifies and intentions. This phenomenon was referred to as ?johar?, that means offering by themselves to hearth in order to be saved from disgrace.

So, this was ?Johar?, afterwards practiced by Hindu girls in each element of India in order to save by themselves from the dirty palms of Islamic marauders. There was no forced immolation in that procedure, no malign Brahmins, no cruel priests, therefore no ?Sati-Pratha.? And for suicide no other particular person can be blamed, other than those Islamic marauders whose threat pressured Hindu girls to suicide.

?Sati? is an ancient Sanskrit expression, that means a chaste lady who thinks of no other gentleman than her own husband. The well-known examples are Sati Anusuiya, Savitri, Ahilya etc. None of them committed suicide, allow by yourself becoming forcible burned. So how is that that they are called Sati? The word ?Sati? signifies a chaste woman, and it has no co-relations with possibly suicide or murder. The phrase ?Sati? was by no means accompanied by ?Pratha?. The phrase, ?Sati-Pratha? was a Christian Missionary invention. Sati was taken sort the higher than quoted source and ?Pratha? was taken from the apply of Johar?, (by distorting its which means from ?suicide? to ?murder?) and the myth of ?Sati-Pratha? was born to haunt Hindus permanently.

So ?Sati-Pratha? (in its modern day avatar of forcible widow burning) is not a fault of Hinduism but a crime of Islam. Islam is the perpetrator of crime right here, and Hinduism, the victim. It is a joint crime of Islam and Christianity. The crime of Islam was transposed on Hinduism (absolving Islam in the process) by the historical connivance of anti-Hindu forces (Islam, Christianity and Marxism).

To insert a spiritual clause right here, it is quite critical to say that in present day occasions anytime is there a circumstance noted of voluntary immolation of a girl on her husband?s pyre, it is by no means noted that the dying woman shrieked in the unbearable ache of the burning flesh. Sucha circumstance is reported by Mark Tully in his ebook ?No Full Stops in India?. He tells of a lady Roop Kanwar in the village Deorala, district Sikar of Rajasthan who in Sep 1987 voluntarily died by burning herself with fire, with no emitting any cries or shrieks. So what does it signify? No mortal can continue being tranquil when his flesh is being burnt. So what is the reason of this superhuman good quality of these women? The solution lies in dharma, Yoga and meditation. There are umpteen tales in Puranas and Vedas in which the two males and women voluntarily take dying by immolating their mortal bodies by various indicates, like fire. The electricity of Yoga helps make them oblivious of the suffering of the decay of the mortal physique. So girls who voluntarily gave up their lifestyle in fireplace had been empowered with the power of Yoga. Suffering did not touch their chaste bodies.

Hindus becoming oppressed for hundreds of years have formulated a mental state named ?Dhimmitude?, which signifies a psychological slavery to its lengthy time oppressor Islam. So, now even people Hindus who stand towards Islam are timid, defensive and guilty of some hypothetical crimes, imagined for their triste, for them by their enemies. They still can?t think freely, analyze history objectively and identify the true naturel of Hinduism, i.e., Dharma.

But, if they want to re-generate Dharma, Reality and Goodness then they will have to look at Heritage in its genuine light, with Courage, Resolution and with Objectivity. Then only they will be ready to re-find out their Dharma and do one thing for its regeneration.

Background getting ?Dharma? alone hopes them to do so.

Finest reply:

Solution by TENTMKR

Hindu girls have been burning their selves extended ahead of Islam arrived.

They are house of the Hindu men.


Christians Discriminated In opposition to by Israel

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/historical past/rel-christians.html


Give your solution to this issue underneath!

One thought on “Q&A: must christian missionary be prohibited in India?

  1. Pingback: Missionary scriptures | Chandl

Leave a Reply