Query by thirddegree77: Samurai vs. Knight. Who would acquire in a one particular on a single combat?
A French knight, ca. mid 15th century, a potent medieval tank and professional on the battlefield who is willing to die for his lord and his god.
A Japanese samurai, ca. late 16th century, a experienced master of combating, dueling, and war inclined to struggle and die for his daimyo and inclined to be killed or even destroy by themselves for honor.
Each of these highly proficient warriors are each fearless extremely sklled warriors.
Steel plate armor (chainmale beneath plate)
Quite experienced horsemanship
Major armor and weapons
Low visibility from helmet
broadswords,axes,spears,halberds,lances,crossbow, and flails
Samurai positive aspects:
lighter armor and weapons
skilled horse archer
less potent horses
katana,yumi(longbow),yari(spear),naginata,kenabo, and zanbato(significant cavalry sword)
Given this who do you believe would win.
Very best answer:
Reply by Stead
This is not even a levels of competition. A silly knight would begin charging, just before he even gets 10m inside the Samurai he would be shot dead by an arrow.
If the Samurai is a veteran, he will destroy him in one shot at the weak spot before the knight could even lift his arm. If he is a noob, he’ll just pull out a dart or powder and blind him in the eyes.
Knights have no range weapon, they will be slaughtered just like they get slaughtered by Genghis Khan’s horse archers.
Give your answer to this problem under!